Original Thinking

Month

January 2012

5 posts

Bankability

Bankability means proper risk allocation.

Make sure the person best able to manage the risk is given the risk to manage

  • No point in giving the risk to someone who cannot manage the risk
  • If the person fails to manage the risk, they have to compensate the project
Jan 20, 2012
“Money can make or break. If money is the only thing that unites husband and wife, then when I whistle, my wife must jump. If one day, I run out of money. I do not expect her to stay by my side. This I can accept without too much fuss. The same goes for mercenaries. If you die, that is really an occupational liability. King and country doesn’t come into it at all – it is a quid quo pro transaction. But if I love a woman with all my heart and I even do things for her which I would never ever do unless I loved her more than even myself – that is a very different arrangement – here I have a right to ask, “why will you not stay and fight with me in my hour of need?” And if she is a real woman of substance, she would lower her head in shame and shed a tear. I think we should never confuse ourselves as to what money can and cannot do. Experience informs me confusing the idea of what money is supposed to do usually ends being a very unhappy enterprise – that is why the serious men of this world are ALWAYS very clear and brutal about using money either as a means to an end or just regarding it as an end. They are very clear, so clear as to suggest, if anyone is in doubt, you can always rely on them to spell out the rules of engagement.” —
Jan 15, 2012
“

We are a species that needs and wants to understand who we are. Sheep lice do not seem to share this longing, which is one reason why they write so little. But we do. We have so much we want to say and figure out.

You begin to string words together like beads to tell a story. You are desperate to communicate, to edify or entertain, to preserve moments of grace or joy or transcendence, to make real or imagined events come alive. But you cannot will this to happen. It is a matter of persistence and faith and hard work. So you might as well just go ahead and get started.

Writing and reading decrease our sense of isolation. They deepen and widen and expand our sense of life: they feed the soul. When writers make us shake our heads with the exactness of their prose and their truths, and even make us laugh about ourselves or life, our buoyancy is restored. We are given a shot at dancing with, or at least clapping along with, the absurdity of life, instead of being squashed by it over and over again. It’s like singing on a boat during a terrible storm at sea. You can’t stop the raging storm, but singing can change the hearts and spirits of the people who are together on that ship.

”
—
Jan 15, 2012
Better Productivity

Brad Feld had a post “Managing Priorities”. I am intrigued by the method he has been using and which he finds effective. It goes like this:

  • Max of 3 Priorities in a week
  • While we all do a lot more than 3 things a day, start off each day to reinforce the 3 priorities and lodge them firmly in your brain.
  • When I start a week, I make a clear mental commitment to get these priorities done. Each day when I wake up, I think about what I need to do to get the closure on these priorities.
  • If you can’t get one done, it rolls over into the next week, but it should not get off the list.
  • And they should all be able to be completed by the end of the week. This is not the “New Year” type of resolutions.
  • Most importantly, they are clearly defined and easily explained (e.g. if you walk up to me and ask me what my P1s are for this week, I should be able to recite them without thinking.)
Jan 15, 2012
Can we build this type of culture in a law firm?

“You people obviously don’t understand the business we are in. The regulations will not allow an idea like this, and our stakeholders won’t embrace it. Don’t even get me started on our IT infrastructure’s inability to support it. And then there is the problem of ….”

The best innovators are learners, not knowers. The same can be said about innovative cultures; they are learning cultures. The leaders who have built these cultures, either through intuition or experience, know that in order to discover, they must eagerly seek out things they don’t understand and jump right into the deep end of the pool. They must fail fearlessly and quickly and then learn and share their lessons with the team. When they behave this way, they empower others around them to follow suit—and presto, a culture of discovery is born and nurtured.

In school, the one who knows the most gets the best grades, goes to the best college, and gets the best salary. On the job, the person who can figure things out the quickest is often celebrated. And unfortunately, it is often this smartest, most-seasoned employee who eventually becomes expert in using his or her knowledge to explain why things are impossible rather than possible.

This employee should be challenged, retrained, and compensated for failing forward. But if this person’s habits are too deeply ingrained to change, you must let him or her go. Otherwise, this individual will unwittingly keep your team from seeing opportunity right under your noses. The folks at Blockbuster didn’t see Netflix‘s (NFLX)ascendancy. The encyclopedia companies didn’t see Google (GOOG) coming. But the problem of expert blindness existed well before the Internet.

Two of our favorites from rinkworks.com: “This ‘telephone’ has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered as a means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to us.” —Western Union internal memo, 1876.

And “The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value. Who would pay for a message sent to nobody in particular?” —David Sarnoff’s associates in response to his urgings for investment in the radio in the 1920s.

At one point in his career, Thomas A. Edison had dozens of inventors working for him at the same time. He charged each with the task of failing forward and sharing the learning from each discovery. All of them needed to believe that they were part of something big. You want the same sort of people.

You don’t want the victims, nonbelievers, or know-it-alls. It is up to you to make sure they take their anti-innovative outlooks elsewhere.

Jan 8, 2012
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January 1
  • February
  • March 1
  • April 2
  • May 3
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 5
  • February 5
  • March 9
  • April 2
  • May 1
  • June 5
  • July 5
  • August 6
  • September
  • October
  • November 1
  • December 1
2011 2012
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July 18
  • August 18
  • September 6
  • October 21
  • November 15
  • December 21